On 02/15/2017 05:06 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
On 02/15/2017 11:41 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Joao Martins wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins(a)oracle.com>
>> ---
>> docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml
>> index b756a97..b0629b5 100644
>> --- a/docs/news.xml
>> +++ b/docs/news.xml
>> @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@
>> was <code>virtio-net</code>.
>> </description>
>> </change>
>> + <change>
>> + <summary>
>> + libxl: add tunnelled migration support
>> + </summary>
>> + <description>
>> + Add tunnelled migration to libxl driver, which is always capable of
>> + strong encryption and doesn't require any extra network
connection
>> + other than what's required for remote access of libvirtd.
>> + </description>
>> + </change>
>> </section>
>> <section title="Improvements">
>> <change>
>
> Pushed, but only after realizing tunneled is misspelled :-(. No use perpetuating
> the misspelling of tunneled, so I've pushed a trivial followup.
Interesting, I didn't know that. Greping the whole repo for "tunnelled" and
you
will find a *lot* of matches:
$ git grep tunneled | wc -l
10
$ git grep tunnelled | wc -l
1242
So the incorrect spelling is used over 100x more than the correct one :-)
Hmm, but the internets aren't really clear. Some hits say
tunneled vs tunnelled
being both correct.
Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to
recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks prefer I
can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit.
Regards,
Jim