
On 01/03/2018 06:00 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
virSecurityManagerDomainSetPathLabel is used to make a path known to the security modules, but today is used interchangably for - paths to files/dirs to be accessed directly - paths to a dir, but the access will actually be to files therein
Depending on the security module it is important to know which of these types it will be.
The argument fullpath augments the call to the implementations of DomainSetPathLabel that can - per security module - decide if extra actions shall be taken.
For now dac/selinux handle this as before, but apparmor will make use of it to add a wildcard to the path that was passed.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> --- src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 2 +- src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 4 ++-- src/security/security_apparmor.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- src/security/security_dac.c | 3 ++- src/security/security_driver.h | 3 ++- src/security/security_manager.c | 5 +++-- src/security/security_manager.h | 3 ++- src/security/security_selinux.c | 3 ++- src/security/security_stack.c | 5 +++-- 9 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c index 70fb406..ac3e182 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ qemuDomainWriteMasterKeyFile(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, }
if (qemuSecurityDomainSetPathLabel(driver->securityManager, - vm->def, path) < 0) + vm->def, path, false) < 0) goto cleanup;
ret = 0; diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c index a0f430f..1a0923a 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c @@ -3401,7 +3401,7 @@ qemuProcessBuildDestroyMemoryPathsImpl(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, }
if (qemuSecurityDomainSetPathLabel(driver->securityManager, - def, path) < 0) { + def, path, true) < 0) { virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, _("Unable to label %s"), path); return -1; @@ -4514,7 +4514,7 @@ qemuProcessMakeDir(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, }
if (qemuSecurityDomainSetPathLabel(driver->securityManager, - vm->def, path) < 0) + vm->def, path, true) < 0) goto cleanup;
ret = 0; diff --git a/src/security/security_apparmor.c b/src/security/security_apparmor.c index dcd6f52..60a8e08 100644 --- a/src/security/security_apparmor.c +++ b/src/security/security_apparmor.c @@ -956,9 +956,22 @@ AppArmorSetSavedStateLabel(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr, static int AppArmorSetPathLabel(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr, virDomainDefPtr def, - const char *path) + const char *path, + bool fullpath)
@fullpath seems misleading to me. At first I though that this is absolute vs. relative path. Maybe allowSubtree is a better name? Also, I know we don't do it everywhere, but given how ambiguous this argument's name is can we have a comment describing the function and its arguments please?
{ - return reload_profile(mgr, def, path, true); + int rc = -1; + char *full_path = NULL; + + if (fullpath) { + if (virAsprintf(&full_path, "%s/{,**}", path) < 0) + return -1; + rc = reload_profile(mgr, def, full_path, true); + VIR_FREE(full_path); + } + else + rc = reload_profile(mgr, def, path, true);
Almost. Curly braces and else should be at one line. But then you get a syntax-check error because there's another rule saying that if one branch has curly braces the other one has to have them too. Michal