On 25.02.2015 17:29, Laine Stump wrote:
On 02/25/2015 06:12 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 24.02.2015 20:39, Laine Stump wrote:
>> libvirt was unconditionally calling virNetDevBandwidthClear() for
>> every interface (and network bridge) of a type that supported
>> bandwidth, whether it actually had anything set or not. This doesn't
>> hurt anything (unless ifname == NULL!), but is wasteful.
>>
>> This patch makes sure that all calls to virNetDevBandwidthClear() are
>> qualified by checking that ifname != NULL and that it really had some
>> bandwidth setup done.
>>
>> (NB: an sa_assert(detach->ifname) was added in
>> lxcDomainDetachDeviceNetLive() because the preceding new check of
>> detach->ifname before calling virNetDevBandwidthClear() caused
>> Coverity to complain about a possible null dereference.)
>> ---
>> src/conf/netdev_bandwidth_conf.c | 6 ++++--
>> src/lxc/lxc_driver.c | 7 ++++++-
>> src/network/bridge_driver.c | 6 ++++--
>> src/qemu/qemu_hotplug.c | 4 +++-
>> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
> How about moving the check for non-NULL ifname into
> virNetDevBandwidthClear()? Its counterpart virNetDevBandwidthSet() does
> something similar over @bandwidth argument. And after 2/2 it'll done the
> same over @ifname.
Yeah, I had some reason for doing it externally originally, but then
forgot the reason (or it went away), then after I fixed
virNetDevBandwidthSet() I thought about changing this one, and decided
against it, mostly because I was tired and couldn't be certain that I
*didn't* have a valid reason in the first place. I'll do another spin
that way.
I don't want to discourage you to post patches, but I believe they are
easy enough to be fixed locally and pushed. I don't want to enforce v2
just because of this small nit.
Michal