On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:26:52PM +0200, David Weber wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. September 2013, 11:27:30 schrieb Daniel P.
Berrange:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:47:08AM +0200, David Weber wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 6. September 2013, 12:10:04 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 09:09:25AM +0200, David Weber wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > we try to use vcpu pinning on a 2 socket server with Intel Xeon
E5620
> > > > cpus, HT enabled and 2*6*16GiB Ram but experience problems if we try
> > > > to
> > > > start a guest on the second socket:
> > > > error: Failed to start domain test
> > > > error: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor:
> > > > kvm_init_vcpu failed: Cannot allocate memory
> >
> > # virsh freecell 0
> > 0: 86071624 KiB
> >
> > # virsh freecell 1
> > 1: 75258628 KiB
> >
> > # virsh edit test
> > <domain type='kvm'>
> >
> > <name>test</name>
> > <uuid>08cdc389-78bf-450c-89f4-b4728edabdbf</uuid>
> > <memory unit='KiB'>1048576</memory>
> > <currentMemory unit='KiB'>1048576</currentMemory>
> > <vcpu placement='static' cpuset='4-7'>1</vcpu>
> > <numatune>
> >
> > <memory mode='strict' nodeset='1'/>
> >
> > </numatune>
> > <os>
> >
> > <type arch='x86_64'
machine='pc-i440fx-1.5'>hvm</type>
> > <boot dev='hd'/>
> >
> > </os>
> > <features>
> >
> > <acpi/>
> > <apic/>
> > <pae/>
> >
> > </features>
> > <clock offset='utc'/>
> > <on_poweroff>destroy</on_poweroff>
> > <on_reboot>restart</on_reboot>
> > <on_crash>restart</on_crash>
> > <devices>
> >
> > <emulator>/usr/bin/qemu-kvm</emulator>
> > <controller type='usb' index='0'>
> >
> > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00'
slot='0x01'
> >
> > function='0x2'/>
> >
> > </controller>
> > <controller type='pci' index='0'
model='pci-root'/>
> > <controller type='ide' index='0'>
> >
> > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00'
slot='0x01'
> >
> > function='0x1'/>
> >
> > </controller>
> > <input type='mouse' bus='ps2'/>
> > <graphics type='vnc' port='-1'
autoport='yes'/>
> > <video>
> >
> > <model type='cirrus' vram='9216'
heads='1'/>
> > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00'
slot='0x02'
> >
> > function='0x0'/>
> >
> > </video>
> > <memballoon model='virtio'>
> >
> > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00'
slot='0x03'
> >
> > function='0x0'/>
> >
> > </memballoon>
> >
> > </devices>
> >
> > </domain>
> >
> > # virsh start test
> >
> > error: Failed to start domain test
> > error: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor:
> > kvm_init_vcpu failed: Cannot allocate memory
> >
> > Allocating memory on this node with numactl works fine
> > # numactl --cpubind=1 --membind=1 -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=2G
> > count=1
> > 0+1 records in
> > 0+1 records out
> > 2147479552 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 0.60816 s, 3.5 GB/s
>
> Hmm, this makes no sense at all to me. Your configuration looks totally
> valid and you have plenty of memory in both nodes.
After reading a bit more about cgroups, I now think I know whats going on.
Lets assume we have a 2 node dualcore system and start a guest named 'test'
without cpu or memory pinning.
* libvirt creates a controller under cpuset/machine/test.libvirt-qemu:
cpuset/machine/test.libvirt-qemu/cpuset.cpus -> 0-3
cpuset/machine/test.libvirt-qemu/cpuset.mems -> 0-1
* libvirt creates a controller for every vcpu:
cpuset/machine/test.libvirt-qemu/vcpu*/cpuset.cpus -> 0-3
cpuset/machine/test.libvirt-qemu/vcpu*/cpuset.mems -> 0-1
* libvirt creates a controller for qemu:
cpuset/machine/test.libvirt-qemu/emulator/cpuset.cpus -> 0-3
cpuset/machine/test.libvirt-qemu/emulator/cpuset.mems -> 0-1
Now we want to pin the guest to the second node
virsh # numatune test --nodeset 1
error: Unable to change numa parameters
error: Unable to write to '/sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/machine/Ubuntu.libvirt-
qemu/cpuset.mems': Device or resource busy
What happens is that Libvirt tries to set cpuset/machine/test.libvirt-
qemu/cpuset.mems to 1 but this is not possible because
cpuset/machine/test.libvirt-qemu/vcpu*/cpuset.mems and
cpuset/machine/test.libvirt-qemu/emulator/cpuset.mems still contain 0-1.
Libvirt has to change these values before!
Oooh, interesting hypothesis. I wonder if this is a kernel behaviour
change. I'm fairly sure that in the past if you removed a cpu from the
cpuset mask, it would automagicaly purge it from all children.
Please file a bug about this - it should be possible to make libvirt
do the right thing and purge child masks explicitly first.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|