On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:49:28PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:37:36PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The flag has a typo in it, it's "...-than=..." and not
"...-then=...",
> so this was in fact never used. Since we're also using -Wvla (without
> size), we should already get warnings about any variable length arrays
> anyway, so the additional "-Wvla-larger-than" does not make much sense
> and thus we can simply drop this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> meson.build | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
This makes sense to me and I could not find any possible typo alias
anywhere (like we have in virsh, for example). The only thing I am
unsure about is whether we want to actually use the proper naming. The
reason is that by default this is set to vla-larger-than=PTRDIFF_MAX
which is pretty huge number. On the other hand the man page for GCC
says it is only effective with -ftree-vrp (-02 and above).
The -Wvla-larger-than=PTRDIFF_MAX default is irrelevant though,
because we've blocked all use of VLAs by using -Wvla.
IOW, AFAICT, -Wvla-larger-than and -Wvla are mutually exclusive
from a conceptual POV.
I do not see whether using the predefined alloc_max would make sense or
not. So I am not against just removing it, but feel free to overrule me
as I did not look into this as much as others will be capable of.
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
> diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
> index 4f23f9104e..40c841e777 100644
> --- a/meson.build
> +++ b/meson.build
> @@ -390,7 +390,6 @@ cc_flags += [
> '-Wvariadic-macros',
> '-Wvector-operation-performance',
> '-Wvla',
> - '-Wvla-larger-then=4031',
> '-Wvolatile-register-var',
> '-Wwrite-strings',
> ]
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|