[libvirt] [PATCH] build: fix build without numactl
Under ./configure --without-numactl but with numactl-devel installed,
the build fails with:
../../src/util/virnuma.c: In function 'virNumaNodeIsAvailable':
../../src/util/virnuma.c:407:5: error: implicit declaration of function
'numa_bitmask_isbitset' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node);
^
and other failures, all because the configure results for particular
functions were used without regard to whether libnuma was even being
linked in.
* src/util/virnuma.c (virNumaGetPages): Fix message typo.
(virNumaNodeIsAvailable): Correct build when not using numactl.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
---
Pushing under the build-breaker rule.
src/util/virnuma.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virnuma.c b/src/util/virnuma.c
index 46f48d2..7a11a3b 100644
--- a/src/util/virnuma.c
+++ b/src/util/virnuma.c
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ virNumaGetMaxCPUs(void)
}
-#ifdef HAVE_NUMA_BITMASK_ISBITSET
+#if WITH_NUMACTL && HAVE_NUMA_BITMASK_ISBITSET
/**
* virNumaNodeIsAvailable:
* @node: node to check
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ virNumaGetDistances(int node ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
{
*distances = NULL;
*ndistances = 0;
- VIR_DEBUG("NUMA distance information isn't availble on this host");
+ VIR_DEBUG("NUMA distance information isn't available on this host");
return 0;
}
#endif
--
1.9.3