On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 12:02:12 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 11:14 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> Personally I think the shift is *more* usable than a raw page size,
> since the latter is inevitably going to involve counting a bunch of
> zeroes to see if it's the number you meant. Allowing forms like
"16M"
> / "16G" could be nicer; not sure if we have existing helper functions
> which will make that easy.
I was indeed thinking about the latter.
> TBH, if the user is already thinking about page sizes at this low
> level, I don't think doing it by shift is much of a stretch.
I disagree that it's such a low level setting that only people who
can do bitwise shifts off the top of their heads will want to
tweak: if it were, then libvirt will probably not need to expose
it in the first place :)
Well, it will most probably be configured by some policy code from a
upper layer mgmt tool, so I don't think users will actually ever touch
it.