On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 09:13:11 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:10:53AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 09:05:28 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 02:57:41PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> > > usb-storage is a compound device that automatically creates a USB mass
> > > storage device and a SCSI device as its backend. Unfortunately it lacks
> > > some configuration options that are usually present with a SCSI device,
> > > and cannot represent CD-ROM in particular.
> > >
> > > Replace usb-storage with usb-bot, which can be combined with a manually
> > > created SCSI device. libvirt will configure the SCSI device in a way
> > > identical with how QEMU does for usb-storage except that now it respects
> > > a configuration option to represent CD-ROM.
> >
> > Is this change compatible for QEMU's VMState aka migration ABI compatible
?
>
> Based on my tests so far it seems compatible in terms of VMstate and
> also guest ABI at least to the first glance (lsusb, lsscsi -v etc) seems
> identical at least for the default 'read-write'/non-cdrom disk.
>
> I didn't yet test migrating with a cdrom to an older daemon though,
> which based on the above paragraph should have guest-visible difference.
Any such configuratin of the latter is arguably a bug though ? It was
never presenting a cdrom, and that we allowed it was just a sign of
missing XML validation surely ?
Yes that could be the case. Although it is possible that it's even a
regression from switching to blockdev as I've seen claims that usb cdrom
did behave correctly at that point; but I didn't care to validate that
for myself given how long ago it was that we switched to blockdev.