Re: [netcf-devel] [libvirt] [RFC] Reporting host interface status/statistics via netcf/libvirt, and listing active vs. inactive interfaces

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:03:32PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:42:11PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:22:13PM -0700, David Lutterkort wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 19:24 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > IP address information should be in the XML, and indeed surely it is > > > > already there in order to allow non-DHCP based IP address config > > > > on interfaces ? > > > > > > Yes, for statically configured interfaces, the IP information is in the > > > XML - that is the _configured_ IP info though, not necessarily the one > > > that the interface actually uses. The two can diverge, for example, if > > > an interface is already up and then reconfigured. > > > > BTW I was looking at the Relax-NG grammar and found the following > > confusing when providing an IP address: > > > > <element name="ip"> > > <optional> > > <attribute name="address"><ref name="ip-mask"/></attribute> > > </optional> > > </element> > > > > I'm not really sure what ip-mask really means, are you trying to > > put in a single attribute both the IP address and the netmask ? > > If that's the case I would really suggest to split the two as separated > > IP and netmask in the XML structure, either separate attributes or > > another element for the netmask. Best to us the explicit structure of > > XML than a construct hidden inside the text field, unless I > > misunderstood the use case... > > 'netmask' should really be avoided these days, in preference to 'prefix' > since the latter works for IPv4 and IPv6, while the former only works > for IPv4. 'netmask' can be auto-calculated from 'prefix' by apps if they > really care about it. Fine by me, just that I think they should be hold by 2 separate attributes or element if possible at this point.