On 08/12/14 17:17, Ján Tomko wrote:
On 08/12/2014 03:44 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Check that secdef->imagelabel exists before blindly applying it.
> ---
> src/security/security_selinux.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/security/security_selinux.c b/src/security/security_selinux.c
> index c078cab..cf59d6c 100644
> --- a/src/security/security_selinux.c
> +++ b/src/security/security_selinux.c
> @@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ virSecuritySELinuxSetSavedStateLabel(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> virSecurityLabelDefPtr secdef;
>
> secdef = virDomainDefGetSecurityLabelDef(def, SECURITY_SELINUX_NAME);
> - if (!secdef || !secdef->relabel)
> + if (!secdef || !secdef->imagelabel || !secdef->relabel)
> return 0;
>
> return virSecuritySELinuxSetFilecon(savefile, secdef->imagelabel);
>
I think this is just covers up incorrect usage of this function on shutoff
domains, because if a running domain has a selinux label, it should have the
imagelabel generated.
Fair enough. I'll drop this one.