On 01/23/2019 07:52 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 01/23/2019 07:08 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 16:27 -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> On 01/22/2019 12:39 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> On 01/21/2019 11:49 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>>>> Completely agree with the rationale here; however, in order to
>>>> really match the way other devices are handled, I think we should
>>>> make it so you can use
>>>>
>>>> <controller type='scsi' model='virtio'/>
>>>>
>>>> as well, which of course would behave the same as the currently
>>>> available version. What do you think?
>>>
>>> Yes I agree it would be nice to add that option. I suggest we make it a
>>> separate issue from this series though incase it's a contentious idea,
>>> v2 is already shaping up to be ~30 patches...
>
> I don't think that's going to be particularly controversial, and we
> should really make sure we get all the user-facing bits in at the
> same time IMHO, so I'd say go for it... If you're really unsure
> about it you can add that model in a separate patch right after this
> one, that way if someone happens not to like that we can drop it and
> otherwise we can squash them together before pushing.
>
Alright will do
I'm realizing now I forgot this, sorry. I'll add it to my todo list
Thanks,
Cole