Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 4/6] virsh: Resolve Coverity DEADCODE
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:18:31PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
Use 'dead_error_condition' instead of
'dead_error_begin'
Just wondering - what is the difference?
Doesn't dead_error_begin require a dead_error_end?
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
---
tools/virsh.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
ACK.
Jan
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 819 bytes)