On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 01:56:11PM +0800, Chen Fan wrote:
in virDomainFSInfoFree(), don't free the virDomainFSInfo data.
==10670== 80 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 576 of 793
==10670== at 0x4A06BC3: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:618)
==10670== by 0x509DEBD: virAlloc (viralloc.c:144)
==10670== by 0x19FBD558: qemuAgentGetFSInfo (qemu_agent.c:1837)
==10670== by 0x1A03CF91: qemuDomainGetFSInfo (qemu_driver.c:19238)
Signed-off-by: Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
---
src/libvirt-domain.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
This does fix the memory leak and makes the function behave like it's
documented in virDomainGetFSInfo and virDomainFSInfoFree:
http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainGetFSInfo
http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainFSInfoFree
But it changes the public API - if there are applications that already
work around this function by freeing the info, this change would
introduce a double free.
I would NACK this if the documentation for both APIs didn't say that's
how this function should behave.
I'd like to hear a second opinion.
Jan
diff --git a/src/libvirt-domain.c b/src/libvirt-domain.c
index 04545fd..7f8a7ce 100644
--- a/src/libvirt-domain.c
+++ b/src/libvirt-domain.c
@@ -11337,4 +11337,6 @@ virDomainFSInfoFree(virDomainFSInfoPtr info)
for (i = 0; i < info->ndevAlias; i++)
VIR_FREE(info->devAlias[i]);
VIR_FREE(info->devAlias);
+
+ VIR_FREE(info);
}
--
1.9.3
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list