On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 12:31:46PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Well, in 8ad126e6 we tried to fix a memory corruption problem.
However, the fix was not as good as it could be. I mean, the
commit has one line more than it should. I've noticed this output
just recently:
# ./run valgrind --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes ./tools/virsh domblklist
gentoo
==17019== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==17019== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==17019== Using Valgrind-3.10.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==17019== Command: /home/zippy/work/libvirt/libvirt.git/tools/.libs/virsh domblklist
gentoo
==17019==
Target Source
------------------------------------------------
fda /var/lib/libvirt/images/fd.img
vda /var/lib/libvirt/images/gentoo.qcow2
hdc /home/zippy/tmp/install-amd64-minimal-20150402.iso
==17019== Thread 2:
==17019== Invalid read of size 4
==17019== at 0x4EFF5B4: virObjectUnref (virobject.c:258)
==17019== by 0x5038CFF: remoteClientCloseFunc (remote_driver.c:552)
==17019== by 0x5069D57: virNetClientCloseLocked (virnetclient.c:685)
==17019== by 0x506C848: virNetClientIncomingEvent (virnetclient.c:1852)
==17019== by 0x5082136: virNetSocketEventHandle (virnetsocket.c:1913)
==17019== by 0x4ECD64E: virEventPollDispatchHandles (vireventpoll.c:509)
==17019== by 0x4ECDE02: virEventPollRunOnce (vireventpoll.c:658)
==17019== by 0x4ECBF00: virEventRunDefaultImpl (virevent.c:308)
==17019== by 0x130386: vshEventLoop (vsh.c:1864)
==17019== by 0x4F1EB07: virThreadHelper (virthread.c:206)
==17019== by 0xA8462D3: start_thread (in /lib64/libpthread-2.20.so)
==17019== by 0xAB441FC: clone (in /lib64/libc-2.20.so)
==17019== Address 0x139023f4 is 4 bytes inside a block of size 240 free'd
==17019== at 0x4C2B1F0: free (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==17019== by 0x4EA8949: virFree (viralloc.c:582)
==17019== by 0x4EFF6D0: virObjectUnref (virobject.c:273)
==17019== by 0x4FE74D6: virConnectClose (libvirt.c:1390)
==17019== by 0x13342A: virshDeinit (virsh.c:406)
==17019== by 0x134A37: main (virsh.c:950)
The problem is, when registering remoteClientCloseFunc(), it's
conn->closeCallback which is ref'd. But in the function itself
it's conn->closeCallback->conn what is unref'd. This is causing
imbalance in reference counting. Moreover, there's no need for
the remote driver to increase/decrease conn refcount since it's
not used anywhere. It's just merely passed to client registered
callback. And for that purpose it's correctly ref'd in
virConnectRegisterCloseCallback() and then unref'd in
virConnectUnregisterCloseCallback().
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
Not only this is nice because it fixes a bug by removing some lines, it maybe
needs to be backported all the way down to v1.0.5 main branches.
src/remote/remote_driver.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/remote/remote_driver.c b/src/remote/remote_driver.c
index ec26ebe..aca00c0 100644
--- a/src/remote/remote_driver.c
+++ b/src/remote/remote_driver.c
@@ -546,10 +546,6 @@ remoteClientCloseFunc(virNetClientPtr client ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
cbdata->freeCallback = NULL;
}
virObjectUnlock(cbdata);
-
- /* free the connection reference that comes along with the callback
- * registration */
- virObjectUnref(cbdata->conn);
}
/* helper macro to ease extraction of arguments from the URI */
--
2.4.6
ACK
Pavel