On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:52:06AM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:21:11AM -0800, Ian Main wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:58:45AM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > I don't know what the convention is in libvirt-sandbox, but
> > spice-gtk/libvirt-glib try to protect public API calls with
> > g_return_val_if_fail(GVIR_SANDBOX_IS_CONFIG_NETWORK_FILTER(config), NULL);
> > so that invalid objects are caught early on
>
> I notice the whole codebase for libvirt-sandbox doesn't have these
> checks. Might be worth going through and fixing them at some point. In
> fact most of the things you mentioned in the review could be applied to
> most of the code base. I'll see how things go, I may do a clean up
> patch if others think it's a good idea.
Fine with me, feel free to ignore the coding style related comments which
would be better done in a cleanup patch changing the whole code base. On
the other hand, these changes can also be done incrementally, starting with
the new code you add in your patch ;)
Yeah, I went with the latter.. posted a new patch with cleanups you
suggested. Thanks again for the review.
Ian