On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 02:49:46AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 01/26/2012 10:29 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * virStorageVolResize:
>> + * @vol: pointer to storage volume
>> + * @capacity: new capacity
>
> In what units? virDomainBlockResize used kbytes as the unit,
Shouldn't that be implicit unless specified otherwise in the docs? I
am fine with or without explicit docs.
Given that virStorageVolInfo works in bytes, then I'd say we should
use bytes here too.
It is a shame we used kbytes for virDomainBlockResize.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|