Re: [libvirt] ANNOUNCE: Stable release libvirt-0.9.11.2

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Doug Goldstein thus spake: >On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Jason Helfman <jhelfman(a)e-e.com&gt; wrote: >>>Okay, I screwed up the tarball for the first stable release, due to not >>>building it from a fresh checkout :/ No changes for this one except a >>>version >>>bump and dist rebuild. >>> >>>This release can be downloaded at: >>> >>>http://libvirt.org/sources/libvirt-0.9.11.2.tar.gz >>>

>>>Cole >>> >>>-- >>>libvir-list mailing list &gt;&gt;&gt;libvir-list(a)redhat.com >>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list >>> >>> >> >>Is there any particular reason that the project is using the same naming >>convention for stable releases? It appears to be a minor revision update >>from the standard release cycle. From an outsiders prospective, I don't >>know how anyone would think that 0.9.11.2 is not a standard update from >>0.9.11, as there is no distinction in either the name from the distributed >>file, or documentation (unless I missed it denoted specifically on >>libvirt.org). >> >>Would there be any objection to using a distribution file name >>libvirt-stable-0.9.11.2.tar.gz ? >> >>To me, it is confusing, but that is just my opinion. >> >>Thanks, >>Jason >> > >Don't change the tarball name like that. That would just plain suck >and be different than how 99% of projects out there do things. > Ok, but having the same download path is just as confusing, as it looks like an update to 0.9.11, when it is a different release.