Re: [netcf-devel] [libvirt] [RFC] Reporting host interface status/statistics via netcf/libvirt, and listing active vs. inactive interfaces
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:56:44PM +0000, David Lutterkort wrote:
The one argument for <address> tags is that it makes it cleaner
to
bundle addressing info like <ip> and routing info, to make sure that the
user doesn't specify ipv6 routes for an interface without ipv6
addresses.
Yes that grouping is what I really had in mind when I did the exercise
in modelling based on Dan's version. I would say that from an human POV
it also immediately make clear what IP versions are supported, easier to
look at the attriubutes on teh big blocks and the number of big blocks.
I think it makes it a bit less error-prone.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/