29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +0000, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> This is a follow-up to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309
>
> If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit <address/>, libvirtd
> ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to
> the first free USB port implicitly by qemu.
> That breaks other USB devices which have explicit <address/> - ports they
> should be connected to may be already occupied by disks.
>
> With first patch applied, if one has USB disk connected to the USB hub, qemu
> fails to start, because it does not know anything about hubs yet (when parsing
disks).
> That's why second patch is needed.
>
> Vladislav Bogdanov (2):
> qemu: Do not ignore address for USB disks
> qemu: pass -usb and usb hubs earlier, so USB disks with static
> address are handled properly
ACK to both