On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/12/2012 08:50 AM, Li Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> On 09/12/2012 07:59 AM, Li Zhang wrote:
>>> Sorry for wrong subject prefix of my mail, correct it. -:)
>>>
>>
>> The [libvirt] tag in the prefix is done automatically, you don't have to
>> do that ;)
>>
> Got it, thanks. :)
>
>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Li Zhang <zhlcindy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I am testing the virsh commands, and I found that these two commands:
>>>> * domhostname
>>>> * hostname
>>>>
>>>> From the manual of virsh commands:
>>>> * hostname
>>>> Print the hypervisor hostname.
>>>> * domhostname domain
>>>> Returns the hostname of a domain, if the hypervisor makes
>>>> it available
>>>>
>>>> It seems that both of them want to get the host name. What's the
>>>> difference between them?
>>>>
>>
>> Basically it's what's written. "virsh hostname" will give you
the
>> hostname of the hypervisor (host), but "virsh domhostname
<domain>" is
>> trying to get the hostname of the specified domain (guest).
>>
> Oh, domhostname is the guest's name. Am I right?
domhostname is the guest's hostname, however...
> I saw virsh also has such a command to get guest's name:
> $virsh domname domain-id-or-uuid
>
...this is the name of the domain (basically this function converts ID
or UUID of the domain to its name).
Ah, I see. -:)
Thanks.
>>>> From the source code, domhostname only is supported
for openvz on 0.10.1.
>>>> Will this be only for openvz in the future?
>>>>
>>
>> I don't know about anyone trying to work on this, but it doesn't mean it
>> won't change. It's possible to implement it for some other hypervisors
>> as well, but nobody had the need to, I guess.
>
> I see, thanks a lot for your reply!
>
>>
>>>> Any idea?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot in advance. -:)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> -Li
>>>
>>
>> Martin
>>
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
-Li