Re: [PATCH 1/5] virpci: Switch to an implementation using libpciaccess
Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy(a)gmail.com> writes:
Anyway, my question is the following:
Should we split this series into two: the virpci part and the bhyve
part?
If I'm not mistaken, they are not tied to each other, and splitting
them would make review easier as the bhyve part is almost ready
to get it.
If you don't redo virpci, then the bhyve part won't even work.
If you divide the series into two parts, you first need to take virpci, and then bhyve.
--
Alexander Shursha