Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:02:13AM -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> ---
> src/org/libvirt/jna/StoragePoolPointer.java | 7 +++++++
> src/org/libvirt/jna/StorageVolPointer.java | 7 +++++++
> src/org/libvirt/jna/virStoragePoolInfo.java | 11 +++++++++++
> src/org/libvirt/jna/virStorageVolInfo.java | 11 +++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 src/org/libvirt/jna/StoragePoolPointer.java
> create mode 100644 src/org/libvirt/jna/StorageVolPointer.java
> create mode 100644 src/org/libvirt/jna/virStoragePoolInfo.java
> create mode 100644 src/org/libvirt/jna/virStorageVolInfo.java
> +++ b/src/org/libvirt/jna/virStoragePoolInfo.java
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +package org.libvirt.jna;
> +
> +import com.sun.jna.Structure;
> +
> +public class virStoragePoolInfo extends Structure
> +{
> + public int state ;
> + public long capacity ;
> + public long allocation ;
> + public long available ;
Same long long -> long question, also the original is unsigned, maybe
it should be kept that way
These were long long in the C code, which maps to java long. I do not
have an answer for the unsigned part. That is a place where java is a weak.
-- bk