On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 13:22 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 01:26:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > I was actually intending to take a simpler approach - just compile a
> > newer gnutls into /opt and let the website build use that.
>
> Sure, that would probably do the trick as far as
libvirt.org itself
> is concerned; however, we would not only have to keep CentOS 6
> around in the CentOS CI environment, but also figure out a way to
> reproduce the same hack there if we want to make sure changes in
> libvirt don't accidentally break building the website.
I'd just drop the CI job and we'll deal with problems with the
website build if and when we find them
In that case, going for the local GnuTLS build on
libvirt.org is
perfectly fine with me.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization