Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Drop the leading lib from libvirt. Based on testing by thomas@scripty.at this is a better way to load the libarary
On Thursday 30 July 2009 16:24:02 Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:13:49AM -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> ---
> src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Per previous discussion, ACK !
It's better to not try to load a library we know doesn't exist (or if
it was it might not be ours...)
Now tried to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH, that works too (without this patch). But I
really do not understand why setting that env var is necessary
when /usr/local/lib is in my ld.so.conf and considering the following output,
which is looking good, AFAIK:
$ ldconfig -p | grep libvirt
libvirt_jni.so.0 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/local/lib/libvirt_jni.so.0
libvirt_jni.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/local/lib/libvirt_jni.so
libvirt_jni.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib/libvirt_jni.so
libvirt.so.0 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/local/lib/libvirt.so.0
libvirt.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/local/lib/libvirt.so
Ah, and tried JNA 3.0.9 too, no difference at all.
kr,
thomas