[Libvir] [RFC] Device attach/detach on virsh

I want to add I/F to do attach/detatch of VIF and VBD to virsh with virDomainAttachDevice()/virDomainDetachDevice(). And, I have two proposals about I/F for virsh to do attach/detach of VIF and VBD. proposal 1: Virsh catches MAC, bridge name, device name (physical,virtual), and another by the command option. ex) ------------------------------------------------------------------ # virsh help attach(detach)-vif(vbd) NAME attach(detach)-vif(vbd) - attach(detach) vif(vbd) SYNOPSIS * VIF attach(detach)-vif <domain> <MAC> <bridge> ... or * VBD attach(detach)-vbd <domain> <virt-dev> ... DESCRIPTION Attach(Detach) vif(vbd) device OPTIONS <domain> domain name, id or uuid * VIF <MAC> MAC address of vif <bridge> bridge name of vif ... * VBD <virt-dev> virtual device name of vbd <phy-dev> physical device name of vbd ... ------------------------------------------------------------------ <advantage> - I/F is easy to use than proposal 1. (Because the user does not have to make XML) <disadvantage> - I/F increases because I/F of VIF and VBD becomes separate. (So, the addition of I/F is necessary at any time for supporting devices other than VIF and VBD. ) - Handling of optional analysis, handling of XML making are necessary in virsh.c, and processing becomes complicated. proposal 2: virsh catches a definition of a device by XML ex) ------------------------------------------------------------------ # virsh help attach(detach)-device NAME attach(detach)-device - attach(detach) device from an XML file SYNOPSIS attach(detach)-device <domain> <file> DESCRIPTION Attach(Detach) device from an XML <file> OPTIONS <domain> domain name, id or uuid <file> XML file of device description ------------------------------------------------------------------ <advantage> - I/F is unified without affecting a device type. (I/F is simple) - Handling of virsh.c is simple. (Optional analysis is not necessary) <disadvantage> - The user has to describe XML.(It is troublesome) I think that specifications that a user is easy to use (proposal 1) are better. Please, give me an opinion which proposal is better. Thanks, Masayuki Sunou