Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 06:28:47PM +0200, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> Use the same error messages for serial devices validation which are
> already used in bhyve_domain.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy(a)gmail.com>
> ---
> src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c b/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
> index 18f65cf757..5757a41e7e 100644
> --- a/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
> +++ b/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ bhyveBuildConsoleArgStr(const virDomainDef *def, virCommand
*cmd)
> /* bhyve supports 4 ports: com1, com2, com3, com4 */
> if (chr->target.port > 3) {
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
> - _("only two serial ports are supported"));
> + _("Only four serial ports are supported"));
> return -1;
> }
>
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ bhyveBuildConsoleArgStr(const virDomainDef *def, virCommand
*cmd)
> break;
> default:
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
> - _("only nmdm and tcp console types are
supported"));
> + _("Only 'nmdm' and 'tcp' console
types are supported"));
> return -1;
> }
> }
FWIW, in the QEMU driver, when building the CLI, we make the assumption that
the domani validation has been performed, so we wouldn't repeat things like
the "chr->target.port > 3" check again.
Yes, I think I need to do the same. Not sure if it's better to do in one
shot or gradually move validation to bhyve_domain.c when touching
related areas. Probably doing in one shot is better for consistency of
the codebase.
> With regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
>