On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > >
> > > yeah !
> > > It seems gluster uses it on both sides
> >
> > Since libvirt has been using this port range first, would you open a
> > bug on gluster to avoid it?
> >
> > Dan. (prays that Vdsm is not expected to edit libvirt's migration port
> > range on installation)
>
> If it makes you feel better, you can't even do that :-) Unfortunately,
> the port range used for migration is hard-coded in libvirt. And since we
> don't use port allocator yet (patches are in progress), we don't
> automatically avoid ports that are already taken. All this is going to
> change, though.
Are these patches posted? Is there a libvirt BZ that tracks this issue?
Dan.
In the mean time I got 3.4.1 source rpm for fedora 19 and rebuilt with
patches review as in comment#2 of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018178
Now range is 50152+ and I'm able to successfully migrate in oVirt my
CentOS 6.4 VM
Gianluca