On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 01:43:52PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:51:37PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 08:29:33PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > After updating the virBuffer APIs to protect against improper usage I have
> > been thinking about how we might provider safer memory allocation APIs
> > with protection against common usage errors and compile time validation of
> > checks for failure.
>
> Here is an updated version which removes the bogus VIR_REALLOC function
> and illustrates use in capabilities.c which is a more interesting test
> case than hash.c
Clearly that makes for cleaner code, and more importantly safer.
We should do this, possibly one module at a time, then we can try to
add new syntax-check rules forbidding malloc/realloc. Also potentially
we could hook up memory checks at runtime with the macro, if we need
to in the future.
+1 for applying this now, then we can fix one module at a time later.
we don't need to grow a gigantic patch.
Ok I applied this. I'll update some more of the driver code over the course
of the week.
Dan.
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|