On 09/15/14 16:57, John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/15/2014 04:09 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 09/13/14 15:27, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Coverity complains about the calculation of the buf & len within
>> the PROBE macro. So to quiet things down, do the calculation prior
>> to usage in either write() or qemuMonitorIOWriteWithFD() calls and
>> then have the PROBE use the calculated values - which works.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 18 +++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c
>> index 6059133..80c6ef8 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c
>> @@ -478,6 +478,8 @@ static int
>> qemuMonitorIOWrite(qemuMonitorPtr mon)
>> {
>> int done;
>> + char *buf;
>> + int len;
>
> len should be "size_t"
>
Of course seen when formatting %d on the PROBE() I was reminded I had to
change the type of the printf format ;-)... Also, I would be remiss if I
didn't point out...
struct _qemuMonitorMessage {
int txFD;
char *txBuffer;
int txOffset;
int txLength;
Sigh, definitely not the last place with incorrect types :)