On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 01:50:03PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Veillard
<veillard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I was a bit afraid of the .0 effect on release name, but we really
> have a number of problem with 0.10.0 that ought to be fixed in a
> "brown paper bag" release. I would urge people to report and try to
> fix the problem being raised in 0.10.0, let's try to get them fixed
> today or tomorrow and I will cut a new release on Friday,
>
> Sorry about that, but somehow we didn't managed to catch even serious
> problem during the freeze, at some point we need to fix the problem of
> testing the code that we push on git on a daily basis, we have many
> tools but we lack at doing the continuous testing :-\
>
> Daniel
>
Daniel,
Would it be worth creating a 0.10.x branch and just keeping it as a
stable branch until next month's release?
Until 0.10.2 ? That sounds awkward to me. For 0.10.1, I expect to push
it tomorrow once we have identified the bugs raised and fixed the most
critical ones, and that will be this month still :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/