On 03/09/2012 03:04 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:56:52PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Resurrecting an old thread:
>
> I didn't see any clear conclusion in this thread (this is why I am
> resurrecting it), except that many were arguing that libvirt should
> simply copy and/or generate the CPU model definitions from Qemu. I
> really don't think it's reasonable to expect that.
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:54:15PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently I realized that all modern CPU models defined in
>> /etc/qemu/target-x86_64.conf are useless when qemu is used through libvirt.
>> That's because we start qemu with -nodefconfig which results in qemu
ignoring
>> that file with CPU model definitions. We have a very good reason for using
>> -nodefconfig because we need to control the ABI presented to a guest OS and we
>> don't want any configuration file that can contain lots of things including
>> device definitions to be read by qemu. However, we would really like the new
>> CPU models to be understood by qemu even if used through libvirt. What would
>> be the best way to solve this?
>>
>> I suspect this could have been already discussed in the past but obviously a
>> workable solution was either not found or just not implemented.
>
> So, our problem today is basically:
>
> A) libvirt uses -nodefconfig;
> B) -nodefconfig makes Qemu not load the config file containing the CPU
> model definitions; and
> C) libvirt expects the full CPU model list from Qemu to be available.
I could have sworn we had this discussion a year ago or so, and had decided
that the default CPU models would be in something like /usr/share/qemu/cpu-x86_64.conf
and loaded regardless of the -nodefconfig setting. /etc/qemu/target-x86_64.conf
would be solely for end user configuration changes, not for QEMU builtin
defaults.
But looking at the code in QEMU, it doesn't seem we ever implemented this ?
I don't remember that discussion and really don't think I agree with the
conclusion.
If libvirt wants to define CPU models on their own, they can. If libvirt wants
to use the user's definitions, don't use -nodefconfig.
CPU models aren't a QEMU concept. The reason it's in the configuration file is
to allow a user to add their own as they see fit. There is no right model
names. It's strictly a policy.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Daniel