Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:21:37AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 11:41:48AM -0400, Dave Allan wrote:
>>>> static int
>>>> +virStorageBackendSCSIStartPool(virConnectPtr conn ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>>>> + virStoragePoolObjPtr pool
>>>> ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int retval = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + return retval;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> +static int
>>>> +virStorageBackendSCSIStopPool(virConnectPtr conn ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>>>> + virStoragePoolObjPtr pool
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int retval = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + return retval;
>>>> +}
>>> Is that really better than suggesting the operation is not supported ?
>> These two functions are, of course, not required for this patch.
>> They're there because I had started to implement NPIV support and then
>> thought I should submit this patch before the NPIV patch. I can take
>> them out if you'd like and add them to the subsequent patch where they
>> will have contents.
> Yep, prefer to leave them out if they're unrelated to this patch.
[...]
> ACK
Okay, so I commited a version without virStorageBackendSCSIStartPool
and Stop, I also changed the write() call to safewrite() !
Ok, great--thanks!
Dave