I feel so sorry for my impolite behavior, and waitting for your review opinions :)
On 2018/7/9 17:06, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 16:39:53 +0800, WangJie (Pluto) wrote:
> ping...
Please don't be impatient. Pinging patches after one day is kind of rude
to the reviewers. Not getting a review after 1 day does not mean we
ignored that patch. The same applies for the weekend. People don't
usually work over the weekend. Too eager pinging may actually lead to
ignoring your patches.
>
> On 2018/7/5 10:05, Jie Wang wrote:
>> >From 29482622218f525f0133be0b7db74835174035d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jie Wang <wangjie88(a)huawei.com>
>> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 09:52:03 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] qemu: stop qemu progress when restore failed
>>
>> if qemuProcessStartCPUs perform failed in qemuDomainSaveImageStartVM,
>> we need to stop qemu progress, otherwise will remains a wild VM
>> which can't be managed by libvirt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Wang <wangjie88.huawei.com>
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
>> index 9a35e04a85..639b57316d 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
>> @@ -6621,6 +6621,8 @@ qemuDomainSaveImageStartVM(virConnectPtr conn,
>> if (virGetLastErrorCode() == VIR_ERR_OK)
>> virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
>> "%s", _("failed to resume
domain"));
>> +
>> + qemuProcessStop(driver, vm, VIR_DOMAIN_SHUTOFF_FAILED, asyncJob,
0);
>> goto cleanup;
>> }
>> if (virDomainSaveStatus(driver->xmlopt, cfg->stateDir, vm,
driver->caps) < 0) {
>>
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list