Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Test suites using the port allocator don't want to have
different
behaviour depending on whether a port is in use on the host. Add
a VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_SKIP_BIND_CHECK which test suites can use
to skip the bind() test. The port allocator will thus only track
ports in use by the test suite process itself. This is fine when
using the port allocator to generate guest configs which won't
actually be launched
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>
---
src/libxl/libxl_driver.c | 3 ++-
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 9 ++++++---
src/util/virportallocator.c | 14 ++++++++++----
src/util/virportallocator.h | 7 ++++++-
tests/virportallocatortest.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c b/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
index 515d5c9..70f9bb8 100644
--- a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
+++ b/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
@@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ libxlStateInitialize(bool privileged,
if (!(libxl_driver->reservedVNCPorts =
virPortAllocatorNew(_("VNC"),
LIBXL_VNC_PORT_MIN,
- LIBXL_VNC_PORT_MAX)))
+ LIBXL_VNC_PORT_MAX,
+ 0)))
goto error;
if (!(libxl_driver->domains = virDomainObjListNew()))
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
index 3a7622a..b3a9036 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
@@ -680,19 +680,22 @@ qemuStateInitialize(bool privileged,
if ((qemu_driver->remotePorts =
virPortAllocatorNew(_("display"),
cfg->remotePortMin,
- cfg->remotePortMax)) == NULL)
+ cfg->remotePortMax,
+ 0)) == NULL)
goto error;
if ((qemu_driver->webSocketPorts =
virPortAllocatorNew(_("webSocket"),
cfg->webSocketPortMin,
- cfg->webSocketPortMax)) == NULL)
+ cfg->webSocketPortMax,
+ 0)) == NULL)
goto error;
if ((qemu_driver->migrationPorts =
virPortAllocatorNew(_("migration"),
cfg->migrationPortMin,
- cfg->migrationPortMax)) == NULL)
+ cfg->migrationPortMax,
+ 0)) == NULL)
goto error;
if (qemuSecurityInit(qemu_driver) < 0)
diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.c b/src/util/virportallocator.c
index b68133a..fa17475 100644
--- a/src/util/virportallocator.c
+++ b/src/util/virportallocator.c
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ struct _virPortAllocator {
unsigned short start;
unsigned short end;
+
+ unsigned int flags;
};
static virClassPtr virPortAllocatorClass;
@@ -71,7 +73,8 @@ VIR_ONCE_GLOBAL_INIT(virPortAllocator)
virPortAllocatorPtr virPortAllocatorNew(const char *name,
unsigned short start,
- unsigned short end)
+ unsigned short end,
+ unsigned int flags)
{
virPortAllocatorPtr pa;
@@ -87,6 +90,7 @@ virPortAllocatorPtr virPortAllocatorNew(const char *name,
if (!(pa = virObjectLockableNew(virPortAllocatorClass)))
return NULL;
+ pa->flags = flags;
pa->start = start;
pa->end = end;
@@ -193,9 +197,11 @@ int virPortAllocatorAcquire(virPortAllocatorPtr pa,
if (used)
continue;
- if (virPortAllocatorBindToPort(&v6used, i, AF_INET6) < 0 ||
- virPortAllocatorBindToPort(&used, i, AF_INET) < 0)
- goto cleanup;
+ if (!(pa->flags & VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_SKIP_BIND_CHECK)) {
+ if (virPortAllocatorBindToPort(&v6used, i, AF_INET6) < 0 ||
+ virPortAllocatorBindToPort(&used, i, AF_INET) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
if (!used && !v6used) {
/* Add port to bitmap of reserved ports */
diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.h b/src/util/virportallocator.h
index c8aa6de..2fdb8d9 100644
--- a/src/util/virportallocator.h
+++ b/src/util/virportallocator.h
@@ -28,9 +28,14 @@
typedef struct _virPortAllocator virPortAllocator;
typedef virPortAllocator *virPortAllocatorPtr;
+typedef enum {
+ VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_SKIP_BIND_CHECK = (1 << 0),
+} virPortAllocatorFlags;
+
virPortAllocatorPtr virPortAllocatorNew(const char *name,
unsigned short start,
- unsigned short end);
+ unsigned short end,
+ unsigned int flags);
int virPortAllocatorAcquire(virPortAllocatorPtr pa,
unsigned short *port);
diff --git a/tests/virportallocatortest.c b/tests/virportallocatortest.c
index 48d2c9a..96d2ade 100644
--- a/tests/virportallocatortest.c
+++ b/tests/virportallocatortest.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ VIR_LOG_INIT("tests.portallocatortest");
static int testAllocAll(const void *args ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
{
- virPortAllocatorPtr alloc = virPortAllocatorNew("test", 5900, 5909);
+ virPortAllocatorPtr alloc = virPortAllocatorNew("test", 5900, 5909, 0);
Should these tests be changed to use the new
VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_SKIP_BIND_CHECK flag?
Regards,
Jim
int ret = -1;
unsigned short p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7;
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int testAllocAll(const void *args ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
static int testAllocReuse(const void *args ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
{
- virPortAllocatorPtr alloc = virPortAllocatorNew("test", 5900, 5910);
+ virPortAllocatorPtr alloc = virPortAllocatorNew("test", 5900, 5910, 0);
int ret = -1;
unsigned short p1, p2, p3, p4;