On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 12:08 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:46:57AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > "xenial" (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS) support has been in the works for a
> > long time: it was "just around the corner" last December[1], but
> > it's six months (and one more Ubuntu LTS release) later now and
> > it still hasn't materialized; that, along with the fact that just
> > a couple of months ago[2] the folks at Travis were "super excited"
> > to introduce "trusty" (Ubuntu 14.04 LTS) to their Enterprise
> > offering makes it very hard for me to believe we will be able to
> > run builds on 16.04 anytime soon.
>
> I just had a chat with spice folks and learnt that
gitlab.com provides
> a CI system with free shared runners. The key difference from travis,
> is that gitlab supports a choice of docker images to use, but does not
> support os-x.
>
> So we could drop ubuntu from travis, leaving just the os-x builder,
> and enable use of some docker images under gitlab, to get an equiv
> level of coverage.
Why don't we just add Ubuntu 16.04 and Ubuntu 18.04 workers to the
CentOS CI environment? I'd rather avoid fracturing our CI efforts
further.
The CentOS CI runs post-merge, while the travis CI can run pre-merge
on developer's branches. It is also pushing capacity of the CentOS
CI host to add another 2 VMs to it.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: