On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:20:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:47:45AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:46:27PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:36:58PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> >>On 09/08/2014 01:40 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> docs/formatdomain.html.in | 7 +++-
> >>> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 5 +++
> >>> src/conf/cpu_conf.c | 25 +++++++++++-
> >>> src/conf/cpu_conf.h | 7 ++--
> >>> .../qemuxml2argv-cpu-numa-memshared.xml | 28 ++++++++++++++
> >>> .../qemuxml2argv-hugepages-shared.xml | 45
++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 2 +
> >>> 7 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>> create mode 100644
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-cpu-numa-memshared.xml
> >>> create mode 100644
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-hugepages-shared.xml
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> >>> index 94236dd..b284d6e 100644
> >>> --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> >>> +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> >>> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@
> >>> ...
> >>> <numa>
> >>> <cell id='0' cpus='0-3'
memory='512000'/>
> >>> - <cell id='1' cpus='4-7'
memory='512000'/>
> >>> + <cell id='1' cpus='4-7'
memory='512000' memShared='on'/>
> >>
> >>I wonder if "shared='on'" would be enough, avoiding the
need for a multi-word
> >>attribute.
> >
> >Or how about access="shared|private" ?
> >
>
> I prepended the "mem" so that it is visible that it has something to
> do with the memory, not the whole node. But I'm OK with pushing
> shared= as well. Using access= seems too ambiguously worded to me,
> although if most of you agree...
Sure, memAccess is fine with me.
Is there any possibility of that option having another value (in the
future)? Otherwise shared= seems more appropriate to me. Let's see
what others think, so I can finally get rid of this problem :)
Martin