On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 00:21:23 +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
---
tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml | 5 +-
tests/domaincapstest.c | 2 +-
.../caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.replies | 1324 +++++++++++++++++++-
tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml | 436 ++++++-
4 files changed, 1753 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
b/tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
index f6a98f7..b3d2d2a 100644
--- a/tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
+++ b/tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
@@ -19,13 +19,14 @@
</loader>
</os>
<cpu>
- <mode name='host-passthrough' supported='no'/>
+ <mode name='host-passthrough' supported='yes'/>
<mode name='host-model' supported='yes'>
<model fallback='allow'>POWER8</model>
</mode>
<mode name='custom' supported='yes'>
<model usable='unknown'>POWER8</model>
<model usable='unknown'>POWER7</model>
+ <model usable='unknown'>POWER8</model>
Oh, I forgot to mention that the two POWER8 models here really come from
QEMU. The bug is already reported:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396536
Jirka