On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 08:11:20AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/14/2011 08:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> That would be a valid concern if we passed internal flags over the wire,
>> but we don't.
>
> I'm thinking about the case where a value we currently use for an
> internal flag, gets used for a public flag in the future. In that
> case, any client side checks for curent internal flags would be
> bogus.
Then we already have the bogus situation, where libvirt.c is silently
filtering out internal flags.
I wasn't aware of any existing filtering - we must remove any such
cases.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|