On 2012年07月19日 00:29, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/18/2012 10:03 AM, Jan Tomko wrote:
> Using 'domain-id' to represent domain name, domain id or uuid,
> as introduced in the DOMAIN COMMANDS section.
> ---
> tools/virsh.pod | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virsh.pod b/tools/virsh.pod
> index 4bddf15..ed1efde 100644
> --- a/tools/virsh.pod
> +++ b/tools/virsh.pod
> @@ -580,11 +580,11 @@ If I<--graceful> is specified, don't resort to
extreme measures
> (e.g. SIGKILL) when the guest doesn't stop after a reasonable timeout;
> return an error instead.
>
> -=item B<domblkstat> I<domain> I<block-device>
[I<--human>]
> +=item B<domblkstat> I<domain-id> I<block-device>
[I<--human>]
Hmm. 'virsh help domblkstat' says that the option is spelled --domain,
using the meta-notation '[--domain]<string>'. That is, these commands
are equivalent:
virsh domblkstat mydom mydev
virsh domblkstat --domain=mydom mydev
virsh domblkstat --domain mydom mydev
Our quasi-convention in 'man virsh' has been that if there is a required
option, it is easier to name that option according to its optional --foo
lead-in (that is, writing 'I<domain>' is shorter than writing
'[I<--domain>] B<domain-id>').
But by making 'man virsh' list I<domain-id>, which does not match the
name of the optional --domain lead-in, we are not following this
convention.
<...>
I think I'd rather keep I<domain> in the synopsis, then
alter the explanatory text to point back to our earlier description
of a
valid domain id:
</...
Agreed. "--domain-id" could be confused with "domain id" easily, it
could fall into a another trap. IMO the right way is to clarify
I<domain> can be "domain name", "domain id", or "domain
uuid" somewhere
in the manual. It's similiar for other command groups like network,
pool, etc.
>
> Get device block stats for a running domain.
Get device block stats for the domain-id I<domain>.
where there term 'domain-id' implies 'domain nam, id, or uuid'.
Another option might be adding virsh option aliases, so that:
virsh domblkstat --domain-id=mydom mydev
virsh domblkstat --domain=mydom mydev
become equivalent, and where virsh would then match your proposed 'man
virsh' naming with --domain-id being the canonical option name but the
shorter --domain still working.
Hmm, if we would ever implement unambiguous-abbreviation option parsing,
then --domain is an unambiguous prefix of --domain-id. In that case, we
don't even need option aliasing; we would just fix virsh.c to use the
longer option name everywhere, and scripts using the shorter option name
would still just work, and then your more-descriptive man page would
line up with the C code.
That said, if others like this patch, I'm not opposed to taking it as
is. Take this as a weak ACK.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list