On 02/07/14 15:10, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 03:07:38PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/07/14 15:00, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:33:20AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek(a)redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> docs/formatdomain.html.in | 9 +++++++++
>>> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 10 ++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>>> index ff50214..bf21c46 100644
>>> --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>>> +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>>> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
>>> <boot dev='hd'/>
>>> <boot dev='cdrom'/>
>>> <bootmenu enable='yes'/>
>>> + <boot-strict enable='yes'/>
>>> <smbios mode='sysinfo'/>
>>> <bios useserial='yes' rebootTimeout='0'/>
>>> </os>
>>
>> Reviving the thread. Based on the discussions, I think I now agree that
>> your suggestion to allow toggle of strict mode is probably our least
>> worst way forward.
>>
>> I'd suggest that instead of introducing a new element here, we add
>> an attribute to the <bios> element. eg perhaps this:
>>
>> <bios bootPolicy="strict|fallback">
>>
>>
>> BTW, as a general goal we want all the parsing/xml related changes
>> in one patch. So your patches 1 + 2 could be squashed together.
>
> Oh, I've implemented HALT parsing in OVMF since. See
>
>
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/c3cf8daa
>
> I considered the issue solved, with the above OVMF commit. Do you still
> want me to rework this libvirt series? I can if you want me to.
Based on your explanations it sounds like being able to turn off
strict mode could still potentially be useful to people. So feel
free to rework this series if you think its useful - I won't reject
Thank you. I'm re-appending it to my queue.
Laszlo