On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Guido Günther <agx(a)sigxcpu.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 04:41:58PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 02:36 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > I often find myself doing virsh "define blah.xml; start blah". I
figured
> > adding this would be a easier^Hlazier way to do it.
> > ---
> > tools/virsh-domain.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Offhand, I like it. However,
>
> We have virDomainDefineXML with no flags, but we have virDomainCreateXML
> with flags; maybe the better approach is to add a new creation flag that
> says that in addition to starting the domain, we also make it persistent
> at the same time.
>
> But if we do that, it would argue that 'virsh create --persistent
> blah.xml' is nicer than 'virsh define --start blah.xml', at least in
> that the former needs only 1 API call for new libvirt (but falls back to
> 2 API calls when talking to older libvirt), while the latter always
> needs 2 API calls.
I like that since it would also remove some confusion about the
diffference between create and define from an end user perspective.
Cheers,
-- Guido
I'd like to still add "virsh define --start" in the end. Possibly when
--start is passed, virsh would actually call virDomainCreateXML(). My
feeling is that virsh started out really demoing the API but its
really a fundamental user tool now and we should strive to make it
friendly to use.
--
Doug Goldstein