On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:43:28 -0400, Dave Allan wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 07:16:35AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> I disagree - there's no point in keeping a hidden argument. It is a
> disservice to users to make them have to pass a numeric flags value - if
> they know they are talking to a new enough server that supports a new
> flag, then they should be able to upgrade to a new enough virsh that
> exposes that new flag as a human-readable option name, or directly code
> their task using C or python bindings instead of bothering with virsh.
>
> I think the patch is fine as-is.
+1
Looks like the consensus is that it is safe to remove --flags. I pushed this
patch.
Jirka