On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 03:43:12PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:29:48AM +0900, Tatsuro Enokura wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Tatsuro Enokura wrote:
>>> I don't think that is neccessary. You'll only invoke
>>> virDomainGetSecurityLabel
>>> if virNodeGetSecurityModel() was asuccessfull and the returned secmodel
>>> is not the empty string. In such a scenario I'd expect the call to
>>> virDomainGetSecurityLabel() to always be successful and would want the
>>> user to see any error if it fail
>>
>> OK, I understood.
>>
>> I try your patch, works fine.
>
> If there is not problem, please commit your patch.
This was already commited to CVS as far as I can tell,
I did it about an hour ago but got distracted by lunch before I replied :-)
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|