I see no reason to duplicate this list of architectures. This also allows
more guest architectures to be used with libvirt (like the mips64el qemu
machine I am trying to run).
Signed-off-by: James Cowgill <james410(a)cowgill.org.uk>
---
docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 26 ++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
index 7c6fa5c..fc28fb3 100644
--- a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
+++ b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
@@ -331,7 +331,9 @@
<define name="ostypehvm">
<element name="type">
<optional>
- <ref name="archList"/>
+ <attribute name="arch">
+ <ref name="archnames"/>
+ </attribute>
</optional>
<optional>
<attribute name="machine">
@@ -344,29 +346,13 @@
</element>
</define>
- <define name="archList">
- <attribute name="arch">
- <choice>
- <value>armv7l</value>
- <value>aarch64</value>
- <value>i686</value>
- <value>x86_64</value>
- <value>mips</value>
- <value>ppc</value>
- <value>ppc64</value>
- <value>ppc64le</value>
- <value>s390</value>
- <value>s390x</value>
- <value>sparc</value>
- </choice>
- </attribute>
- </define>
-
<define name="osexe">
<element name="os">
<element name="type">
<optional>
- <ref name="archList"/>
+ <attribute name="arch">
+ <ref name="archnames"/>
+ </attribute>
</optional>
<value>exe</value>
</element>
--
2.1.4