Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ui: Switch "-display sdl" to use the QAPI parser

On 19/05/2022 09.08, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 19/05/2022 08.39, Thomas Huth wrote: > > On 18/05/2022 17.08, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > > Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com&gt; writes: > > > > > > > The "-display sdl" option still uses a hand-crafted parser for its > > > > parameters since we didn't want to drag an interface we considered > > > > somewhat flawed into the QAPI schema. Since the flaws are gone now, > > > > it's time to QAPIfy. > > > > > > > > This introduces the new "DisplaySDL" QAPI struct that is used to hold > > > > the parameters that are unique to the SDL display. The only specific > > > > parameter is currently "grab-mod" that is used to specify the required > > > > modifier keys to escape from the mouse grabbing mode. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com&gt; > > > > --- > > > >   qapi/ui.json            | 27 +++++++++++++++- > > > >   include/sysemu/sysemu.h |  2 -- > > > >   softmmu/globals.c       |  2 -- > > > >   softmmu/vl.c            | 70 +---------------------------------------- > > > >   ui/sdl2.c               | 10 ++++++ > > > >   5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/qapi/ui.json b/qapi/ui.json > > > > index 11a827d10f..a244e26e0f 100644 > > > > --- a/qapi/ui.json > > > > +++ b/qapi/ui.json > > > > @@ -1295,6 +1295,30 @@ > > > >         '*swap-opt-cmd': 'bool' > > > >     } } > > > > +## > > > > +# @GrabMod: > > > > +# > > > > +# Set of modifier keys that need to be hold for shortcut key actions. > > > > +# > > > > +# Since: 7.1 > > > > +## > > > > +{ 'enum'  : 'GrabMod', > > > > +  'data'  : [ 'lctrl-lalt', 'lshift-lctrl-lalt', 'rctrl' ] } > > > > > > This is fine now.  If we ever generalize to "arbitrary set of modifier > > > keys", it'll become somewhat awkward.  No objection from me. Oh well, I just noticed that we already have a GrabToggleKeys enum in qapi/common.json ... I wonder whether I should try to use that instead? It seems to be used in a slightly different context, though, if I get that right ...?