On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 07:05:04AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 3/22/19 5:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:25:21PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> > On 3/19/19 8:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > During initial NIC setup the hypervisor drivers are responsible for
> > > attaching the TAP device to the bridge device. Any fixup after libvirtd
> > > restarts should thus also be their responsibility.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
> >
> > *And* this fixes a bug that someone reported on IRC awhile back (and does it
> > in the correct way, rather than the stupid f'ed up way I would have done
it
> > if I hadn't completely forgot about it until just this instant :-P)
> It isn't supposed to fix any bug ! It should be a no-op refactoring.
>
> What particular bug are you seeing this fix ?
>
> I'd like to describe it if we are fixing something.
Oh wait, you're right. It was near the end of the day and I made the
incorrect leap that the movement caused the code to be executed for all
interfaces, (in particular, those that are <interface type='bridge'>), not
just those that are type='network'. But now I see that it's still qualified
by type == NETWORK, so the situation for interface type='bridge' is
unchanged. So nevermind, carry on.
On the plus side, my patch 07 will make it fairly easy for us to fix
the type=bridge case later.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|