On 01/29/2015 03:13 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/28/2015 03:25 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> If we get to endjob: because of some error earlier such as perhaps
> failure from qemuDomainSaveMemory to open/create the save file and
> the attempt to restart the CPU's fails, then we get the error from
> that restart attempt displayed to the user rather than the error
> from the failed attempt to create a save file.
>
> Upstream commit id '540c339a' changed the flow of the code moving
> the EndAsyncJob call and thus exposing the issue where an error in
> restarting CPUs resulted in the following:
>
> error: Failed to save domain rhel70 to /tmp/pl/rhel70.save
> error: internal error: unexpected async job 3
>
> where /tmp/pl is a NFS root squashed client where the failure to save
> the file (EPERM or ENOTCONN) should result in a failure:
>
> error: Failed to save domain rhel70 to /tmp/pl/rhel70.save
> error: Error from child process creating '/tmp/pl/rhel70.save': Transport
endpoint is not connected
>
> or (REVISIT ORDER - that is if I move the virfile check for ENOTCONN
> to sooner, then we'll never see ENOTCONN)
Is this a note about the possibility of applying the series in a
different order?
Yeah - it was... But when I combined 1&2 after mkletzan's ACK - I
removed it...
John
>
> error: Failed to save domain rhel70 to /tmp/pl/rhel70.save
> error: Error from child process creating '/tmp/pl/rhel70.save': Operation not
permitted
> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
ACK