On 03/12/2010 10:10 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:00:56 -0500
Chris Lalancette <clalance(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> The nodeGetInfo code was always assuming that machine had a
> single NUMA node, which is not correct. The good news is that
> libnuma gives us this information pretty easily, so let's
> properly report it.
>
> NOTE: With recent hardware starting to support CPU hot-add
> and hot-remove, both this code and the nodeCapsInitNUMA()
> code are quickly going to become obsolete. We'll have to
> think of a more dynamic solution for dealing with NUMA
> nodes and CPUs that can come and go at will.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalance(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/nodeinfo.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/nodeinfo.c b/src/nodeinfo.c
> index 0748602..8d7e055 100644
> --- a/src/nodeinfo.c
> +++ b/src/nodeinfo.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,11 @@ int linuxNodeInfoCPUPopulate(virConnectPtr conn, FILE *cpuinfo,
>
> nodeinfo->cpus = 0;
> nodeinfo->mhz = 0;
> - nodeinfo->nodes = nodeinfo->cores = 1;
> + nodeinfo->cores = 1;
> + if (numa_available() < 0)
> + nodeinfo->nodes = 1;
> + else
> + nodeinfo->nodes = numa_max_node() + 1;
>
> /* NB: It is impossible to fill our nodes, since cpuinfo
> * has no knowledge of NUMA nodes */
This commit breaks the build for me with the following message:
"""
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
nodeinfo.c: In function 'linuxNodeInfoCPUPopulate':
nodeinfo.c:163: error: implicit declaration of function 'numa_available'
nodeinfo.c:163: error: nested extern declaration of 'numa_available'
nodeinfo.c:166: error: implicit declaration of function 'numa_max_node'
nodeinfo.c:166: error: nested extern declaration of 'numa_max_node'
make[3]: *** [libvirt_driver_la-nodeinfo.lo] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
...
"""
The code in this file that uses the same functions seems to be protected
by the HAVE_NUMACTL macro.
Yeah, you are right. Sorry about that. Followup patch coming.
--
Chris Lalancette