On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:45:58AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 07:04:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>Below is the plan for delivering the remote patch for review in stages.
>> More details about in each email. I only expect to get through the
>>first two emails today.
>
>I've been testing this out for real today
>
> - IPv6 works correctly
> - Once I generated the client & server certs the TLS stuff was working
> pretty much without issue. Though we could do with printing out some
> clearer stuff in the scenario where user typos on cert/key path names
> as the current stuff is a littel obscure.
Yes, I've fixed this in the latest version so it prints out meaningful &
helpful errors.
> - I've been testing with the QEMU driver and hit a few problems with
> the fact that qemuinternal.c will grab the URIs containing hostnames
> in the virConnectOpen call. So qemu was getting the connection before
> remote driver had a chance. Should be simply to path qemu_internal
> to ignore URIs with a hostname set.
I don't know why this is necessary, since the remote driver is always
supposed to be called first. But anyway I added:
Ahhhhh. That would be my dodgy merging of patches. The patch which
registered the remote driver didn't apply to my checkout so I just
put in a manual call to registerRemote(), but had it after all the
other drivers.
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|