On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:12:11PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:07:39PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 12/05/14 15:02, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > Currently, when there is an API that's blocking with locked domain and
> > second API that's waiting in virDomainObjListFindByUUID() for the domain
> > lock (with the domain list locked) no other API can be executed on any
> > domain on the whole hypervisor because all would wait for the domain
> > list to be locked. This patch adds new optional approach to this in
> > which the domain is only ref'd (reference counter is incremented)
> > instead of being locked and is locked *after* the list itself is
> > unlocked. We might consider only ref'ing the domain in the future and
> > leaving locking on particular APIs, but that's no tonight's fairy tale.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
> > ---
> > src/conf/domain_conf.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > src/conf/domain_conf.h | 2 ++
> > src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
>
> ACK, although given that the devel freeze is tomorrow and second patch
> of this series is pretty invasive, I think that giving this change a
> full dev cycle is a better way to go.
Agreed, particularly as this will be a longer dev cycle than usual
due to christmas - don't want to risk destablising this release.
Definitely, I wouldn't feel very safe this close to release :) I'll
push it after 1.2.11 then.
Thank you for the review,